Podcast

How can organisations optimise UK pensions post-budget?

by | Dec 12, 2025

Future of Work | Payroll
Home 5 Payroll 5 How can organisations optimise UK pensions post-budget?

How can organisations optimise UK pensions post-budget?

What changed in the UK Budget for pensions and salary sacrifice? From 2029, a £2,000 annual cap will be introduced on National Insurance (NI) savings through pension salary sacrifice. Any pension contributions made via salary sacrifice above this cap will become subject to NI.

In this episode of the People Agenda podcast, host Chris Howard is joined by reward experts, Mike Aldred and Jeremy Hill, to discuss the impact of this change in the budget on employees and organisations. They also explore how organisations can prepare for the upcoming changes.

Who is most affected by the change?

Those who will be the affected the most are mid-to-high earners and companies using flexible benefit salary sacrifice schemes are most exposed. This means most UK employers will face either employee cost increases or higher employer NI costs once the cap applies.

Why does the 2029 implementation date still matter now?

System changes, modelling, and reward redesign typically take two to three years to execute. Early action is required to stay ahead, and our guests provide the reasons why:

  • Payroll and benefits systems require configuration and testing cycles of 12+ months.
  • Reward strategy revisions often need one additional year of planning, consultation, and approval.
  • That places active design work starting around 2026–2027 to be fully compliant by 2029.
  • Final legislative detail may still evolve, requiring buffer time for adaptation.

How might companies respond to the changes?

Most employers are likely to keep salary sacrifice in place, but they’ll need to rethink how contributions are structured rather than drop flexibility altogether. Mike and Jeremy outline a few practical approaches:

  • Keep salary sacrifice in place and accept a small NI increase for senior employees.
  • Adjust the mix between fixed employer contributions and flexible employee contributions
  • Revise how variable pay pension waivers are handled, especially in financial services.
  • Include pensions more closely within the overall reward package, alongside healthcare and flexible benefits.

Why should reward architecture be reviewed as a whole?

When pension changes are viewed in isolation, they can throw the wider reward package off balance. When you’re reviewing your reward architecture, a few design considerations to keep in mind are:

  • Re-evaluate the role of pensions across total reward strategy.
  • Assess balance between; fixed pay, pensions, variable compensation and flexible benefits
  • Avoid piecemeal technical fixes that create complexity or inequity across reward elements.

The goal? To preserve the value-for-money, competitiveness, and fairness across the package.

What are the operational risks?

Payroll and benefits systems are central to making policy changes work, and updates can be technically challenging. To help lessen the impact of the changes, Chris and our guests recommend you:

  • Run dual modelling to understand both the pension mechanics and what your payroll systems can actually support.
  • Plan your budgets early for system upgrades, testing cycles, and the transition work needed to roll everything out smoothly.

Why does governance and board engagement matter?

Remuneration Committees will want early reassurance that this is being managed proactively. It is important that organisations show that they’re on top of it by demonstrating:

  • Clear, structured planning
  • Strong cost management
  • A thoughtful approach to minimising employee impact

This helps build confidence that leadership is managing long-term reward sustainability effectively.

Final takeaways

Salary sacrifice remains viable, but its economics change requires early planning, modelling, and reward redesign.

  • NI savings via pensions will reduce from 2029, not vanish.
  • Most large employers are affected.
  • Early analysis prevents rushed operational fixes.
  • Successful responses integrate pensions into total reward strategy rather than isolated scheme changes.
  • Clear communications and robust governance are central to avoiding employee disruption and board concern.

If you’d like to speak to Mike, Jeremy or one of our other reward specialists to discuss your reward strategy, please reach out via the form below:

You may also like

Got a question? Need some support? Contact us today and we'll be happy to help.